As
you will see from the comments below, the advice you get
is quite diverse. In my opinion, the most important thing
for the beginner, is to find a guitar that is easy to
fret. The distance between the top of the fret and the
bottom of the string is called the "action". A
low action means that the strings are closer to the
frets, so that your fingers don't have to press hard to
play a note. If a guitar, be it an acoustic or electric,
has a high action and is to hard to fret, the new player
will quickly become fatigued and playing will get painfull due to a lack of muscle development in the arm,
wrist and fingers. These muscles take time to develop and
will strengthen as you play regularly for a period of
time.
Electric guitars almost always have a lower action than
acoustic guitars, but electric guitars require the
purchase of an amplifier. A good luthier (a professional
guitar technician) can set-up the action of any guitar
and get the lowest possible action without fret buzz.
Random
buyer advice from the gang at WholeNote
Suppose you were buying an
acoustic or electric guitar. What are
some of the common attributes that you
look for? What might you find that would
automatically rule out buying that
guitar? Here's what some members of the
WholeNote community had to say on this
topic:
Christopher
Sung said:
For
me, the following are essential (and keep
in mind that this is a matter of taste):
- Tunability
this is the most important
aspect for me. I check the
intonation and see if it chords
played on the first 5 frets sound
the same as chords on the
12th-17th frets
- Action
the guitar has to be
capable of having nice low action
with no fretbuzz. I'm not a blues
or slide player (for which I
think high action is better) so
I've always looked for low action
guitars
- Playability
how easy is it to get
around the fingerboard? Is it
cumbersome or does it flow? I
suppose this is a combination of
the dimensions of the neck and
the type of fingerboard
- Sound
For an acoustic, yes, but for an
electric, this isn't necessarily
that important to me. You can
always dump some other pickups in
it. I guess, for me, it's a lot
like sniffing a wine cork. As
long as it doesn't reek, the
bottle's probably pretty good...
Jason
Reich said:
I
think I'll use my soon-to-arrive ESP
as the example of what I look for in
a guitar:
- Price
Right here is where it
all happens. Usually the
budget defines the guitar.
(My ESP: $630)
- Sound
Sound is spilt up
between what gizmos give the
guitar its sound (pickups,
body, neck) and how it
actually sounds.
- Gizmos
I like EMG pickups
(HZ's on the ESP), and the
neck joint is important
(Neck-thru on my ESP).
- Actual
sound This isn't
so important for electrics,
because what you hear
unplugged isn't what you hear
when it's plugged in.
- Playability
I like guitars with
fast necks and very low
action. Extra jumbo frets are
also a plus. (All on my ESP)
- Looks
Whoever said,
"Don't judge a book by
its cover", must have
made some very ugly books.
The shape of the body, as
well as the finish, are very
important to a guitar. A
cool-looking guitar gives you
confidence, prestige, social
status, and financial success
(kinda like beer). But
seriously, it is very
important. (My ESP has a see
through finish, and is all
black)
- Brand
This can be very
important. My guitar is
actually not an ESP, but an
LTD (like Squier to a
Fender). The difference is
that ESP makes
"affordable"
guitars for intermediate
players, not beginners.
Thomas
Lombardini said:
I've
been looking for a new guitar for
the last 9 months. I originally
placed sound at the top of
my list. I narrowed it down to a
Martin DC1-E and a Taylor 310CE,
and finally chose the Taylor.
Then, low and behold, Taylor
threw me a curve ball. They came
out with a Mahogany version of
the 310: a 310MCE 25th
Anniversary Commemorative Model.
The store got both in for me and
I went to check them out. The
Mahogany one obviously had a
different sound than the other
(Spruce) but I can't say for sure
if it didn't sound as good.
The
bottom line was: the Mahagany
guitar was just beautiful. I
walked out with it. Taylor is
somewhat pricey, but I think the
workmanship on these guitars is
worth it, and their customer
service is the best I've ever
come across. The playability and
feel was never in question. They
live up to their reputation.
So,
if hypothetically, this guitar
doesn't quite have the sound of
the other, then just the way it
makes me feel when I'm playing it
may affect the way I play. This
may sound crazy, but case in
point, two weeks after buying the
guitar, I got up enough nerve to
do my first live performance at
an "Open Mike" night at
Barnes & Noble. I haven't
been playing that long, so the
extra confidence that guitar
gives me is worth it.
Craig
Smoot said:
Here's
what I usually look for:
- Feel
If the fingers don't flow
and feel comfortable on it, then
usually it's a turn-off for
me. However, a lot of this
is determined by how the music
store likes to set up their
planks on display, so I take it
with a grain of salt knowing that
I'll have to set it up to my
personal tastes anyway.
- "Singability"
You know. When you
pick up a guitar, strum it (unplugged)
and the guitar resonates from the
top of the headstock to the butt
of the body. That's really
when I know that I've got a
possible keeper.
- Intonation
This is a big deal to me,
so it's always something I look
for right away. You can
have the world's most beautiful
guitar, but if the intonation
inherently sucks then you may as
well display it inside a glass
case in your house, because
that's where it'll be most
useful.
- Tone
In general, I usually look
at planks that can offer me
something I can't get out
of the planks I currently
own. For example, since I
don't need another Les Paul I can
safely say that my next guitar
will either be a 7-string or
perhaps a good Tele. Why
have multiple versions of
basically the same thing unless
that's all you yearn for?
Here are
the factors I don't
consider when shopping for an axe:
- Looks
When I was a kid, all I
wanted was "..the
coolest-looking guitar on the
block." I wanted a
Dean ML or K style so bad I could
taste it. I almost made the
mistake one summer of pouring all
my hard-earned lawnmowing money
into a radical-looking plank
called "Infinity by JTG of
Nashville", but luckily good
taste prevailed. As I got
older and my tastes matured, I
began to realize more and more
that it's not the guitar
that makes the player.
- Bells
& Whistles Sure,
I'm an admitted hot-rodder when
it comes to modding my axes so
that I can get the maximum
flexibility out of them, but when
I'm shopping around for a plank,
I could care less whether or not
this guitar has more buttons and
switches that the next one.
Besides, I'll probably end up
modding it myself anyway, so to
me, I could take them or leave
them.
- Name
Brand Case in point:
My Epiphone Les Paul. I
just wanted that classic Paul
tone, but at a reasonable price I
could afford. So what if
many consider them to be a joke!?
Again, it's not the guitar that
makes the player. As long
as I can still make that guitar
sing and scream, who really cares
what plank I'm
playing? After all, it's
all about the music we
make with the tools of our trade,
not how pretty, how
prestigious or how expensive
those tools are.
Dick
Onstenk said:
How
about character? Now that's
something in miss in many new
guitars. When playing a new
guitar in a store I often have
the feeling something is not
there (yet). You know, it sounds
OK but still ...
I
don't know what's so special
about vintage guitars, but maybe
it's a thing called
"character". Every time
I play my 1951 Gibson ES 125, I
hear and feel it. This rather
simple instrument (1 P-90
pick-up, no cutaway) is by no
means my best guitar, but I am
completely in love with it. Many
other older guitars seem to have
that special quality too. There
is more to a guitar than just its
looks and sound, so it seems, and
many vintage guitars seem to have
it.
|
Re: What do
you look for when you buy a guitar?
10/27/1999
1:14:27 PM
Jason Reich wrote:
I think
I'll use my soon-to-arrive ESP as
the example of what I look for in
a guitar.
Price: Right here is where it all
happens. Usually the budget
defines the guitar. (My ESP:
$630)
Sound: Sound is spilt up between
what gizmos give the guitar its
sound (pickups, body, neck) and
how it actually sounds. Gizmos: I
like EMG pickups (HZ's on the
ESP) and a the neck joint is
important (Neck-thru on my ESP).
Actual sound: This isn't so
important for electrics, cuz what
you hear unplugged isn't what you
hear plugged in an electric
guitar.
Playability: I like guitars with
fast necks and very low action.
Extra jumbo frets are also a
plus. (All on my ESP)
Looks: Whoever said "Don't
judge a book by its cover"
must have made some very ugly
books. The shape of the body as
well as the finish are very
important to a guitar. A cool
looking guitar gives you
confidence, prestige, social
status and financial success,
kinda like beer. But seriously,
it is very important. (My ESP has
a see through finish, and is all
black)
Brand: This can be very
important. My guitar is actually
not an ESP, but an LTD (like
Squier to Fender), the difference
is that ESP makes it
"affordable" guitars
for intermediate players, not
begginers. The really cheapo
brands like rogue and carlo
robbelli suck, trust me. (I have
a rogue C40r amp!).
|
Re: What do
you look for when you buy a guitar?
10/29/1999
3:52:35 PM
Thomas Lombardini wrote:
I agree
with your opinion. I've been
looking for a new guitar for the
last 9 months. I originally
placed sound at the top of my
list. I narrowed it down to a
Martin DC1-E and a Taylor 310ce
and finally chose the Taylor.
Then, low and behold, Taylor
threw me a curve ball. They came
out with a Mahogany version of
the 310; a 310mce 25th
Anniversary Commemorative Model.
The store got both in for me and
I went to check them out. The
Mahogany one obviously had a
different sound than the other
(Spruce) but I can't say for sure
if I would say it didn't sound as
good.
The bottom line was, the Mahagany
guitar was just beautiful. I
walked out with it. (I paid for
it first of course.) Taylor is
somewhat pricey, but I think the
workmanship on these guitars is
worth it their customer service
is the best I've ever come
across. The playability and feel
was never in question. They live
up to their reputation. So if
hypothetically, this guitar
doesn't quite have the sound of
the other, just the way it makes
me feel when I'm playing it may
affect the way I play. This may
sound crazy, but case in point,
two weeks after buying the
guitar, I got up enough nerve to
do my first live performance at
an "Open Mic" night at
Barnes & Noble. I haven't
been playing that long so, the
extra confidence that guitar
gives me, is worth it.
|
Re: What do
you look for when you buy a guitar?
10/27/1999
4:01:55 PM
Craig Smoot wrote:
Here's
what I usually look for:
- Feel
Like CS said, if the
fingers don't flow and feel
comfortable on it then usually
it's a turn-off for me.
However, a lot of this is
determined by how the music store
likes to set up their planks on
display, so I take it with a
grain of salt knowing that I'll
have to set it up to my personal
tastes anyway.
- "Singability"
You know. When you
pick up a guitar, strum it (unplugged)
and the guitar resonates from the
top of the headstock to the butt
of the body. That's really
when I know that I've got a
possible keeper.
- Intonation
This is a big deal to me,
so it's always something I look
for right away. You can
have the world's most beautiful
guitar, but if the intonation
inherently sucks then you may as
well display it inside a glass
case in your house, 'cause that's
where it'll be most useful.
- Tone
In general, I usually look
at planks that can offer me
something I can't get out
of the planks I currently
own. For example, since I
don't need another Paul I can
safely say that my next guitar
will either be a 7-string [sidebar:
The Ibanez AX7521 is the best of
all I've played thus far.] or
perhaps a good Tele. Why
have multiple versions of
basically the same thing unless
that's all you yearn for?
Here are
the factors I don't
consider when shopping for an axe:
- Looks
When I was a kid, all I
wanted was "..the
coolest-looking guitar on the
block." I wanted a
Dean ML or K style so bad I could
taste it. I almost made the
mistake one Summer of pouring all
my hard-earned lawnmowing money
into a radical-looking plank
called "Infinity by JTG of
Nashville", but luckily good
taste prevailed. As I got
older and my tastes matured, I
began to realize more and more
that it's not the guitar
that makes the player.
- Bells
& Whistles Sure,
I'm an admitted hot-rodder when
it comes to modding my axes so
that I can get the maximum
flexibility out of them (why
do you think I love Rivera amps
so much?), but when I'm
shopping around for a plank I
could care less whether or not
this guitar has more buttons and
switches that the next one.
Besides, I'll probably end up
modding it myself anyway, so to
me I could take them or leave
them.
- Name
Brand Case in point:
My Epi Les Paul. I just
wanted that classic Paul tone,
but at a reasonable price I could
afford. So frickin' what
if many consider them to be a
joke!? Again, it's not
the guitar that makes the
player. As long as I can
still make that mother sing and
scream, who really cares what
plank I'm playing? After
all, it's all about the music
we make with the tools of our
trade, not how pretty, how
prestigious or how expensive
those tools are.
|
Re: What do
you look for when you buy a guitar?
10/28/1999
5:42:07 PM
Jason Reich wrote:
whew! we
have alot in common. After
reading that, i think I need to
defend my post.
Brand: Ok, if you end up custom
tailoring a guitar to your needs,
you would be fine with a epi. But
for those of us without degrees
in smartness, a guitar should be
set-up nicely while in the shop
so we don't have to ask someone
else to get it fixed. Usually,
the name brand guitars are
well-built, and are set-up
adequately. And another thing, if
you can find a way to make my
rogue c40r amp sound good, I will
worship you.
Looks: I look for a cool
looking guitar second to a cool sounding guitar. That doesn't mean i won't
pay 70 clams for a see thru black
finish (The day draws ever
closer).
Bells and whistles: I play lead,
so I want a floyd rose, I play
metal, so I want EMGs to beef up
my sound. As long as the fancy
knobs serve a purpose, they're
ok.
|
|
|